The Entity of the Mystic Law
- Totaigi Sho -
Question: The lotus of the entity of the Mystic Law is difficult to understand, and therefore metaphor is
used to make the meaning clear. But is there any example in the sutras to support such a practice?
Answer: The sutra says: "[They are] unsoiled by worldly things like the lotus flower in the water. Emerging
from the earth..." Here we see that the Bodhisattvas of the Earth are the lotus of the entity of the Mystic Law, and that
the lotus is being used here as a simile. But I will write to you about this again at some future time.
This teaching represents the ultimate principle of the entire Lotus Sutra. It is the ultimate purpose of
Shakyamuni Buddha’s advent, as well as the heart and core of the Lotus Sutra, which was entrusted to the great bodhisattvas
who sprang up out of the earth so that they might spread it widely in the Latter Day of the Law. Only when the ruler of our
nation has shown himself to have faith may this doctrine be revealed. But until then it should remain a secret teaching. I
have just completed transmitting it to you, Sairen-bo.
Question: What is the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo? Answer: All beings and their environments in any of the
Ten Worlds are themselves the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo.
Question: If so, then is it possible to say that all living beings, such as ourselves, are entities of the
Mystic Law in its entirety?
Answer: Of course. The sutra says: "This reality [of all phenomena] consists of the appearance, nature...
and their consistency from beginning to end."1
The Great Teacher Miao-lo comments on this as follows: "The true entity is invariably revealed in all phenomena,
and all phenomena invariably possess the ten factors. The ten factors invariably function within the Ten Worlds, and the Ten
Worlds invariably entail both life and its environment."2
T’ien-t’ai comments: "All phenomena consisting of the ten factors, Ten Worlds and three thousand
realms are the entities of the Lotus Sutra."3
The Great Teacher Nan-yueh says: "Question: What does Myoho-renge-kyo represent? Answer: Myo indicates that
all living beings are myo or mystic. Ho indicates that all living beings are ho or the Law." And T’ien-t’ai also
says, "The Law of all living beings is mystic."4
Question: If the entity of all living beings is the Mystic Law in its entirety, then are all the actions
and their results that are associated with the nine worlds, from Hell up to Bodhisattva, in effect the entity of the Mystic
Answer: The mystic principle that is the essential nature of phenomena possesses two aspects, the defiled
aspect and the pure aspect. If the defiled aspect is operative, this is called delusion. If the pure aspect is operative,
this is called enlightenment. Enlightenment constitutes the realm of Buddhahood. Delusion constitutes the realms of common
These two aspects, the deluded and the enlightened, are indeed two different phenomena, and yet both are
workings of the one principle, that is, the essential nature of phenomena, or the true aspect of reality. It is like a piece
of crystal. If the crystal is placed in the sun’s rays, it will attract them and produce fire. But if it is placed in
the moon’s rays, it will produce water. The crystal is a single entity, but the effects it produces differ according
to the circumstances.
The mystic principle of the true aspect of reality is like this. The mystic principle of the true aspect
of reality is one, but if it encounters evil influences it will manifest delusion, while if it encounters good influences
it will manifest enlightenment. Enlightenment means enlightenment to the essential nature of phenomena, and delusion, ignorance
It is like the case of a person who in a dream sees himself performing various good and evil actions. After
he wakes up and considers the matter, he realizes that it was all a dream produced by his own mind. This mind of his corresponds
to the single principle of the essential nature of phenomena, the true aspect of reality, while the good and evil that appeared
in the dream correspond to enlightenment and delusion, or ignorance, respectively. When one becomes aware of this, it is clear
that one should discard the ignorance associated with evil and delusion and take as one’s basis the awakening that is
characterized by goodness and enlightenment.
The Daiengaku shutara ryogi Sutra declares: "The beginningless illusions and ignorance that beset all living
beings are all produced by the perfectly enlightened mind of the Thus Come Ones."5
The Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai in his Maka shikan states: "Ignorance and delusion have as their
essence enlightenment. But because of delusion, ignorance becomes manifest rather than enlightenment." The Great Teacher Miao-lo
comments on this as follows: "Enlightenment has no separate entity, but is completely dependent upon ignorance; and ignorance
has no separate entity, but is completely dependent upon enlightenment."6
Ignorance is a state of delusion that must be cut off, whereas enlightenment is the state that one must
manifest. How then can we say that they are a single entity? To resolve doubts on this point, one should have a clear grasp
of the passages that have been quoted here. The example of the dream given in the ninety-fifth volume of the Daichido ron
and the Tendai school’s example7 of the piece of crystal cited above are very interesting illustrations.
Further proof of the truth that ignorance and enlightenment are one in entity is found in the passage in
the Lotus Sutra that reads: "All these phenomena are aspects of an abiding Law, and all the characteristics of the world are
eternal."8 The Daichido ron says: "Enlightenment and ignorance are not different things, not separate things. To understand
this is what is called the Middle Way."
There are many passages of proof asserting that the mystic principle of the true aspect of reality possesses
two aspects, the defiled and the pure. But none can surpass the one in the Kegon Sutra that says, "The mind, the Buddha and
all living beings -- these three things are without distinction," or the passage in the Lotus Sutra that describes the true
aspect of all phenomena.
The Great Teacher Nan-yueh says: "The entity of the mind is endowed with two aspects, the defiled and the
pure. However, it does not have two different forms, but is single in nature and without distinction."9 And the example of
the mirror10 that he gives truly presents a thorough explanation of the subject.
For a more detailed understanding, one may also refer to his interpretations in the Daijo Shikan.11
Another good explanation is given in the sixth volume of Miao-lo’s Hokke gengi shakusen, in the passage
that reads: "While the three thousand realms remain latent [in ordinary beings], they are all designated by the term ‘ignorance.’
But when the three thousand realms all manifest themselves as the result [of Buddhahood], then they are all designated by
the term ‘eternal happiness!’ However, because the three thousand realms themselves remain unchanged, ignorance
is essentially one with enlightenment. Since the three thousand realms all remain constant, they possess both entity and function.12
This commentary makes the matter perfectly clear.
Question: If all living beings are the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo, then are common mortals like ourselves
who are ignorant and deluded, unenlightened and dull-witted, also the entity of the Mystic Law?
Answer: Though there are a great many persons in the world today, they all fall into two categories--those
who believe in the provisional teachings and those who believe in the true teaching. Those who believe in the provisional
and expedient teachings such as the Nembutsu cannot be called the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo. But those who believe in the
Lotus Sutra, which is the true teaching, are the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo, the mystic entity of the true aspect of reality.
The Nirvana Sutra says: "Among all living beings, those who believe in the Mahayana are called the Mahayana people."
The Great Teacher Nan-yueh in his Shianrakugyo writes: "The Daigo shojin Sutra says: ‘Ordinary beings
and the Thus Come One share a single Dharma body. Being pure and mystic beyond comparison, it is called Myoho-renge-kyo.’"
He also says: "Those who practice the Lotus Sutra are pursuing through this single act of devotion the mind that is endowed
with all manner of fortunate results. These are present simultaneously and are not acquired gradually over a long period of
time. This is like the blossom of the lotus which, when it opens, already possesses a large number of seeds or results. Hence
such persons are called the people of the one vehicle." He also says: "The people of the two vehicles and the bodhisattvas
of inferior capacity choose to follow the way of expedient means, practicing methods that assure gradual progress over a long
period of time. But the bodhisattvas of superior capacity honestly discard expedient means and do not carry out the practice
of gradual progress. If they are able to complete the meditation based on the Lotus Sutra, then they will thereby possess
all manner of fortunate results. Persons such as these are called the people of the one vehicle."
The phrase "practice of gradual progress" that appears in this commentary by Nan-yueh has been interpreted
by the scholars of our time to refer to the specific teaching. In fact, however, it refers to the way of expedient means,
as opposed to the way of the Lotus Sutra, which is endowed simultaneously with causes and results. Hence the term "practice
of gradual progress" includes the perfect teachings preached before the Lotus Sutra, the various Mahayana sutras preached
before the Lotus Sutra, and the Mahayana and Hinayana sutras that belong to the sudden and gradual teachings.
As proof, we may cite the following passage in the Muryogi Sutra: "Then I preached the twelve divisions
of the Hodo sutras,13 the Makahannya Sutra and the Kegon teaching of the ocean-imprint meditation, describing the many kalpas
of practice for bodhisattvas."
But the bodhisattvas of superior capacity honestly discard expedient means and do not carry out the practice
of gradual progress. They practice the Lotus Sutra, and when they attain its truth, they simultaneously acquire all manner
of fortunate results. Persons such as these are called the people of the one vehicle.
When we consider the meaning of these various passages, we understand that none of the ordinary persons
and sages of the three vehicles, the five vehicles,14 the seven expedient means, the nine worlds or the four flavors and three
teachings can be called Mahayana followers who are the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo. Though there are Buddhas in these teachings,
they are Buddhas of the provisional teachings and cannot be called Buddhas in the true sense. This is because the Buddhas
of the provisional teachings in their three bodies15 have not yet freed themselves from impermanence. How then could beings
in realms other than Buddhahood be called [the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo]? That is why it is said that a person of humble
station born in the Latter Day of the Law is more worthy of respect than the kings and high ministers who lived during the
two thousand years of the Former and Middle Days.
Nan-yueh says in his commentary: "All living beings have within themselves the storehouse of the Dharma
body, and therefore they are in no way different from the Buddha."16 That is why the Lotus Sutra says: "The pure and ordinary
eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body and mind that one received at birth from one’s father and mother are also like this."17
Nan-yueh also writes: "Question: In what sutra does the Buddha explain the eyes and the other sense organs
and designate them by the name Thus Come One? Answer: The Daigo shojin Sutra says: ‘Ordinary beings and the Thus Come
One share a single Dharma body. Being pure and mystic beyond comparison, it is called Myoho-renge-kyo.’"18 This comes
from a sutra other than the Lotus, but since the Lotus later clarified the same point, it is all right to quote it here.
If we take up the word "share" that is used in this passage of the Daigo shojin Sutra and apply it in our
argument, we may say that those who share in and believe in the Lotus Sutra are the entity of that mystic sutra. But those
who do not share in it, such as the Nembutsu believers, are not the entity of the mystic sutra because their inherent Buddha
nature is being faced away from the Thus Come One of the Dharma body.
In essence, the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo is the physical body that the disciples and followers of Nichiren
who believe in the Lotus Sutra received from their fathers and mothers at birth. Such persons, who honestly discard expedient
means, put faith in the Lotus Sutra alone and chant Nam-myoho-renge-kyo, will transform the three paths of earthly desires,
karma and suffering into the three virtues of the Dharma body, wisdom and emancipation. The threefold contemplation and the
three truths19 will immediately become manifest in their minds, and the place where they live will become the Land of Eternally
Tranquil Light. The Buddha who is the entity of Myoho-renge-kyo, of the Juryo chapter of the essential teaching, who is both
inhabiting subject and inhabited realm, life and environment, body and mind, entity and function, the Buddha eternally endowed
with the three bodies--he is to be found in the disciples and followers of Nichiren. Such persons embody the true entity of
Myoho-renge-kyo; these are the meritorious workings that the spontaneous transcendental powers inherent in it display. Could
anyone venture to doubt it? Indeed it cannot be doubted!
Question: The Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai has explained that the term Myoho-renge is used in two
different senses, one meaning the entity of Myoho-renge and the other being figurative in meaning. What are these two kinds
of renge or lotus?
Answer: The figurative renge or lotus is explained in detail in the three metaphors of the lotus blossom
enfolding the seed, the lotus blossom opening to reveal the seed inside, and the lotus blossom falling blossom enfolding the
seed, the lotus blossom opening to reveal the seed inside, and the lotus blossom falling and the seed ripening, so one should
refer to them. The lotus that is the entity of Myoho-renge is explained in the seventh volume of the Hokke gengi as follows:
"Renge or lotus is not a symbol; it is the actual name of the entity. For example, at the beginning of the kalpa of continuance,
the various things in the world had no names. The sage observed the principles that govern them and on that basis made up
names for them." And he also writes: "Now the name renge is not intended as a symbol for anything. It is the teaching expounded
in the Lotus Sutra. The teaching expounded in the Lotus Sutra is pure and undefiled and explains the subtleties of cause and
effect. Therefore, it is called renge or lotus. This name designates the true entity that the meditation based on the Lotus
Sutra reveals, and is not a metaphor or figurative term."
The Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai also writes: "Question: Does the term renge in fact mean the renge
or lotus that is the essence of the meditation based on the Lotus Sutra? Or does it in fact mean the ordinary lotus that is
a species of plant?"
"Answer: It in fact refers to the lotus that is the essence of the Lotus Sutra. But because the essence
of the Lotus Sutra is difficult to understand, the metaphor of the lotus plant is introduced. A person of sharp faculties
will hear the name and immediately grasp the principle. He has no need to rely upon a metaphor but can understand the Lotus
Sutra directly. But a person of intermediate or inferior perception will not understand immediately. Only through the medium
of a metaphor will he be able to understand. Thus the easily understood metaphor of an actual lotus plant is used to make
clear the difficult-to-understand lotus that is the essence of the Lotus Sutra."
"Thus, in the Lotus Sutra the Buddha employed three cycles of preaching in accordance with the respective
understanding of those of superior, intermediate and inferior capacity. For persons of superior capacity, the renge or lotus
that is the name of the Law was taught. But for persons of intermediate or inferior capacity, the lotus was used as a metaphor
or symbol. As long as one understands that the word is being used both as a name for the Law itself and as a metaphor, depending
upon which of the three groups of persons is being addressed, then there should be no reason to argue over it."20
This passage of commentary means that the supreme principle [that is the Mystic Law] was originally without
a name. When the sage was observing the principle and assigning names to all things, he perceived that there is this wonderful
single Law [myoho] which simultaneously possesses both cause and effect [renge], and he named it Myoho-renge. This single
Law that is Myoho-renge encompasses within it all the phenomena comprising the Ten Worlds and the three thousand realms, and
is lacking in none of them. Anyone who practices this Law will obtain both the cause and the effect of Buddhahood simultaneously.
The sage practiced with this Law as his teacher and attained enlightenment, and therefore he simultaneously
obtained both the mystic cause and the mystic effect of Buddhahood, becoming the Thus Come One of perfect enlightenment and
fully realized virtues.
Thus the Great Teacher Dengyo writes: "A single mind, the entity of Myoho-renge, simultaneously brings to
maturity both the blossom of cause and the calyx of effect. The three cycles of preaching that the Buddha employed each contain
both the lotus that is the entity and the lotus that is a metaphor. The Lotus Sutra as a whole consists of both entity and
metaphor. In particular we may note the seven parables, the three equalities and the ten peerlessnesses, which each contain
the lotus of the entity. And the teaching that fully sets forth this principle is called Myoho-renge-kyo, [the Lotus Sutra]."21
The Great Teacher Miao-lo says: "When interpreting the seven parables, one should understand the renge or
lotus in each of them in terms of the doctrine of the provisional and true teachings. Why? Because these lotuses are no more
than metaphors for the fact that the provisional teachings were set forth for the sake of the true teaching, and that the
provisional teachings are opened in order to reveal the true teaching. All the seven parables are to be understood in this
In the beginning of the kalpa of continuance, a plant existed. The sage observed its principle and gave
it the name renge or lotus. The lotus plant resembles the principle of Myoho-renge in that it simultaneously contains both
cause [blossom] and effect [seed]. Hence the plant came to bear the same name as the principle. The lotus that grows in water
is the lotus that is a plant, such as the pink variety or the white variety. When we speak of the figurative lotus or the
lotus that is a metaphor, it is this lotus plant we mean. This lotus plant is used to help clarify the difficult concept of
Myoho-renge. That is what the Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai means when he says that through the use of this metaphor,
the difficult-to-understand Mystic Law is rendered more comprehensible.
Question: Since the beginning of the kalpa of continuance, has anyone become enlightened to the lotus that
is the entity of the Mystic Law?
Answer: The Shakyamuni Buddha who lived in a past even more distant than gohyaku-jintengo became enlightened
to the lotus that is the entity of the Mystic Law. Thereafter, in age after age and lifetime after lifetime, he declared that
he had attained the way and he revealed the fundamental principle of wisdom and reality.23
In our present world as well he appeared in the kingdom of Magadha in central India, intending to reveal
this lotus of the Mystic Law. But the people lacked the proper capacity and the time was not right. Therefore he drew distinctions
regarding this lotus of the single Law and expounded it as three kinds of flowers, delivering to the people the provisional
teachings of the three vehicles. For over forty years he guided and led them with these temporary teachings according to their
capacities. During this period, because the capacities of the persons he addressed were so varied, he bestowed upon them the
various flowers and plants of the provisional teachings, but he never spoke of Myoho-renge. That is why, In the Muryogi Sutra,
the Buddha said: "In the past I sat upright in the place of meditation [for six years] under the bodhi tree ... In these more
than forty years, I have not yet revealed the truth."
But when he preached the Lotus Sutra, he cast aside the various plants and flowers of the Hinayana doctrines
and the provisional teachings, which correspond to the expedient means of the four flavors and three teachings, and explained
the unique doctrine of Myoho-renge. When he opened the three figurative lotuses to reveal the single lotus of Myoho-renge,
the people of the provisional teachings with their four flavors and three teachings were able to gain the lotus of the first
of the ten stages of security.24 Not until he revealed the lotus of "opening the near and revealing the distant" were they
able to obtain the lotus of the highest result, advancing to the second stage of security, the third stage of security, the
tenth stage, the stage of near-perfect enlightenment25 and, finally, the highest stage of perfect enlightenment.
Question: Exactly which passages in which chapters of the Lotus Sutra expound the lotus that is the entity
of the Mystic Law, and which ones expound the lotus that is a metaphor?
Answer: If we speak in terms of the three groups of voice hearers, then we would say that the whole of the
Hoben chapter expounds the lotus that is the entity, while the Hiyu and Kejoyu chapters expound the lotus that is a metaphor.
However, it cannot be said that explanations of the figurative lotus are entirely lacking in the Hoben chapter, nor can it
be said that the other chapters are without explanation of the lotus as the entity.
Question: If so, then what passage contains a full elucidation of the entity?
Answer: The passage in the Hoben chapter that deals with the true aspect of all phenomena.
Question: How do we know that this passage deals with the lotus that is the entity?
Answer: Because T’ien-t’ai and Miao-lo quote this passage when they explain the essence of the
Lotus Sutra. And the Great Teacher Dengyo in his commentary also writes: "Question: What is the essence of the Lotus Sutra?
Answer: Its essence is the true aspect of all phenomena."26 This passage of commentary clarifies the matter. (Scholars of
the time kept this commentary secret and did not reveal the name of the entity, but the passage is clearly referring to Myoho-renge.)
Furthermore, actual evidence of the entity is to be found in the examples of the three kinds of Buddhas27
described in the Hoto chapter, the bodhisattvas who appeared from the earth, and the dragon king’s daughter who attained
Buddhahood in her present form. The Bodhisattvas of the Earth offer actual evidence because, as a passage of the Lotus Sutra
says, "[They are unsoiled by worldly things] like the lotus flower in the water."28 Thus we learn of the true entity of these
bodhisattvas. And the dragon king’s daughter offers actual evidence because she made her appearance at the gathering
at Eagle Peak, "seated on a thousand-petaled lotus blossom big as a carriage wheel."29
Moreover, the thirty-four manifestations of Bodhisattva Myoon and the thirty-three manifestations of Bodhisattva
Kannon constitute further evidence. For, as the commentary says, "If he had not gained the mysterious power of perfect freedom
of action through the meditation based on the Lotus Sutra, then how could he manifest these thirty-three different forms?"30
In addition, there is the sutra passage that states, "…all the characteristics of the world are eternal."
All these passages are documentary proofs cited by the scholars of our time. Personally, however, I prefer to cite the passage
in the Hoben chapter on the true aspect of all phenomena, and the passage in the Jinriki chapter that refers to "all the doctrines
possessed by the Thus Come One."31 This last passage is also cited by the Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai in his commentary
explaining the five major principles of the Lotus Sutra. Therefore I feel that this passage in particular can be cited as
certain proof of the entity of the Mystic Law.
Question: The documentary proofs and actual proofs that you have cited above are particularly compelling.
But why do you place such emphasis upon this one passage from the Jinriki chapter?
Answer: This passage is profoundly significant, and that is why it is particularly pertinent.
Question: What is that profound significance?
Answer: In this passage, Shakyamuni Buddha explains that he is entrusting to the Bodhisattvas of the Earth,
his original disciples, the five characters of Myoho-renge-kyo, which is the essence of the Lotus Sutra. Shakyamuni, who attained
enlightenment countless kalpas in the past, says elsewhere, "By now the original vows that I made have already been fulfilled.
I have converted all living beings and caused them all to enter the Buddha way."32 Thus, he has already fulfilled his earlier
vow. Then, intending to charge his disciples with the task of accomplishing widespread propagation in the fifth five hundred
years after his death,33 he called forth the Bodhisattvas of the Earth and entrusted them with the heart of the sutra, the
lotus of the entity of the essential teaching. This passage represents the ultimate purpose for which Shakyamuni Buddha appeared
in the world, the secret Law that he attained in the place of meditation. It is this passage that gives proof of the lotus
of the entity that, for those of us who live in the Latter Day of the Law, assures the attainment of Buddhahood in both the
present and future.
Accordingly, at the present time in the Latter Day of the Law, other than the envoy of the Thus Come One,
there can be no one who understands and produces this passage as proof of the lotus of the entity. Truly it is a passage of
secret meaning. Truly it is a matter of great concern. Truly it is to be honored and admired. Nam-myoho-renge-kyo, Nam-myoho-renge-kyo!
(This is what is meant by the statement in the Lotus Sutra that the bodhisattvas of the perfect teachings
preached before the sutra have assembled in a multitude of eighty thousand, wishing to hear the teaching of perfect endowment.34)
Question: Concerning the doctrines of our school, when persons of other sects come and want to know what
passages give proof of the lotus of the entity, what passages from the Lotus Sutra should be cited?
Answer: You should point to the title Myoho-renge-kyo that appears at the very beginning of each of the
twenty-eight chapters of the Lotus Sutra.
Question: But how do we know that the title Myoho-renge-kyo appearing in each chapter is the lotus of the
entity of the Mystic Law? I ask this because, when the Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai explained the title of the Lotus
Sutra, he interpreted the lotus in a figurative manner, so that we would have to say that this is the lotus that is a metaphor,
would we not?
Answer: The renge or lotus in the title of the sutra is explained as both entity and metaphor. In the interpretation
you have just referred to, T’ien-t’ai is explaining the lotus as a metaphor. This is what he does in the first
volume of the Hokke gengi where he discusses the six metaphors of the theoretical and essential teachings. But in the seventh
volume of the same work, he interprets the lotus as the entity of the Mystic Law. Thus T’ien t’ai’s doctrine
is flawless in that it reveals both interpretations, explaining the lotus in the title of the sutra as both entity and metaphor.
Question: How do we know that these two interpretations can be used and that the title can be taken as both
entity and metaphor? When the Great Teacher Nan-yueh explained the five characters Myoho-renge-kyo, he said: "Myo indicates
that all living beings are myo or mystic. Ho indicates that all living beings are ho or the Law. Renge or lotus is a metaphor
that is employed here."35 It would seem, then, would it not, that both Nan-yueh and T’ien-t’ai interpreted the
lotus as a metaphor?
Answer: Nan-yueh’s interpretation is like that of T’ien-t’ai. While it is not entirely
clear from the sutras that there can be two interpretations, that is, taking the lotus as both entity and metaphor, Nan-yueh
and T’ien-t’ai discerned these two meanings through the treatises of Vasubandhu and Nagarjuna.
That is to say, in the Hokke Ron we read: "The words Myoho-renge have two meanings. First, they signify
the lotus that appears on the surface of the water .... The way in which the lotus emerges from the muddy water is used as
a metaphor to explain that when the Thus Come One joins the multitude of listeners, seats himself on a lotus in the same manner
as the various bodhisattvas, and expounds on the unsurpassed wisdom of the Thus Come One and on the enlightened state of purity,
the various voice-hearers, hearing this, are able to obtain the secret storehouse of the Thus Come One. Second, the words
Myoho-renge signify the lotus opening up. [This is a metaphor explaining that] ordinary beings, though exposed to the Mahayana
teachings, are timid and fearful in mind and incapable of taking faith in them. Therefore the Thus Come One opens or reveals
his Dharma body in its purity and wonder, awakening in them the mind of faith."
In this passage, the word "various" in the phrase "the various bodhisattvas" refers to the various bodhisattvas
of the Mahayana and Hinayana teachings who, arriving on the scene when the Lotus Sutra is preached, are able, for the first
time, to understand the lotus of the Buddha. This is clear from the passage in the Hokke ron just quoted. Therefore we know
that the statement that the bodhisattvas had already gained entrance [to enlightenment] through the various sutras was no
more than an expedient.
T’ien-t’ai explains this passage of the Hokke ron as follows: "If we are to explain the meaning
of the treatise, we would say that when the Thus Come One causes ordinary beings to see the Dharma body in its purity and
wonder, he is showing them the lotus that opens through a mystic cause. And when the Thus Come One enters the multitude of
listeners and seats himself on a lotus, he is showing them the lotus that is the realm produced as a mystic result."36
Again, when T’ien-t’ai wishes to give a detailed explanation of the dual interpretation of the
lotus as both entity and metaphor, he quotes the passage in the Daijuku Sutra that reads: "I now bow in reverence before the
lotus of the Buddha," and the passage in the Hokke ron that has just been quoted, to support his argument. As he explains,
"According to the Daijuku Sutra, the lotus is both the cause and the effect of religious practice. When the bodhisattvas seat
themselves on the lotus, this is the lotus of the cause. But the lotus of the Buddha that one bows before in reverence is
the lotus of the effect. Or, if we go by the wording of the Hokke ron, this is the lotus that is the realm produced as a mystic
result. That is, the bodhisattvas, by practicing the Law of the lotus, are as a result able to obtain the lotus of the realm.
Thus we should understand that the objective realm and the subjective being who depends upon it, the cause [which is the bodhisattva
and the effect [which is the Buddha], are all the Law of the renge or lotus. Therefore, what need is there to employ metaphors?
But because dull-witted people cannot understand the lotus of the essential nature of phenomena, an ordinary lotus is introduced
as a metaphor to assist them. What harm is there in that?"37
And elsewhere he says: "If we do not use a lotus, then what are we to employ as a metaphor for all the various
teachings that have been described above? It is because the Law and the metaphor are expounded side by side that we refer
to them by the phrase Myoho-renge."38
Next we come to the Daichido ron of Bodhisattva Nagarjuna, which states: "The lotus represents both the
Law itself and a metaphor for it." The Great Teacher Dengyo, explaining these passages in the treatises of Vasubandu and Nagarjuna,
writes as follows: "The passage in the Hokke ron says that the lotus of what is called Myoho-renge-kyo has two meanings. It
does not say that an ordinary lotus has two meanings. On the whole, what is admirable here is the fact that the Law and the
metaphor that is used for it resemble each other. If they did not resemble each other, then how could the metaphor help people
understand the meaning? That is why the Daichido ron says that the lotus is both the Law itself and a metaphor for it. A single
mind, the entity of Myoho-renge, simultaneously brings to maturity both the blossom of cause and the calyx of effect. This
concept is difficult to understand, but through the use of a metaphor, it can be made easy to understand. The teaching that
fully sets forth this principle is called Myoho-renge-kyo."39
These passages from the treatises and their explanations quoted here will make the matter clear, and one
should therefore examine them carefully. Nothing is hidden or held back, and hence the dual explanations of the lotus as both
entity and metaphor are fully expounded.
In the final analysis, the meaning of the Lotus Sutra is that the metaphor is none other than the entity
of the Law, and the entity of the Law is none other than the metaphor. That is why the Great Teacher Dengyo in his commentary
says: "The Lotus Sutra contains a great many metaphors and parables. However, when it comes to the major parables, we find
that there are seven of them. These seven parables are none other than the entity of the Law, and the entity of the Law is
none other than these metaphors and parables. Therefore there is no entity of the Law outside of the metaphors and parables,
and there are no metaphors and parables outside of the entity of the Law. In other words, the entity of the Law refers to
the entity of the truth of the essential nature of phenomena, while the metaphors and parables represent the entity of the
Mystic Law as manifested in actual phenomena. The manifestations are none other than the entity of the truth, and the entity
of the truth is none other than the manifestations. Therefore it can be said that the Law and its metaphors constitute a single
entity. This is why the passages from the treatises and the annotations by the Tendai school all explain the lotus as both
the Law itself and a metaphor for it."40
This passage is perfectly clear in meaning, and therefore I need say nothing further.
Question: During the Thus Come One’s lifetime, who was able to realize the lotus of the entity of
Answer: During the period of the four flavors and three teachings that preceded the Lotus Sutra, there were
persons of the three vehicles, the five vehicles, the seven expedient means and the nine worlds, and the bodhisattvas of the
provisional perfect teachings, as well as the Buddha of these teachings. But with the exception of the Buddha of the Juryo
chapter of the ,essential teaching, neither any of these persons nor the Buddha of the theoretical teaching had so much as
heard the name of the lotus of the entity expounded in the essential teaching, much less realized it.
During the first forty and more years of his teaching life, the Buddha did not make clear the doctrine of
the lotus of unsurpassed enlightenment that reveals the replacement of the three vehicles with the one vehicle. That is why
the Muryogi Sutra says: "They will in the end never gain unsurpassed enlightenment," by which it means that the lotus of the
replacement of the three vehicles with the one vehicle, which the Buddha revealed in the theoretical teaching, was never expounded
in the period before the preaching of the Lotus Sutra. Much less, then, did he reveal the lotus of the entity, that of "opening
the near and revealing the distant," of "the true identity that is difficult to conceive," of "the fusion of reality and wisdom,"
and of "originally inherent and not created." How could Miroku and the others, who were taught and converted by the Buddha
in his transient status, have had any understanding of such things?
Question: How do we know that the bodhisattvas of the perfect teachings expounded before the Lotus Sutra,
or the bodhisattvas of the perfect teaching set forth in the theoretical teaching of the Lotus Sutra, were not enlightened
to the lotus of the entity of the essential teaching?
Answer: The bodhisattvas of the perfect teachings expounded before the Lotus Sutra did not understand the
lotus of the theoretical teaching of the Lotus Sutra, and the bodhisattvas of the perfect teaching set forth in the theoretical
teaching did not understand the lotus of the essential teaching.
T’ien-t’ai says: "Even successors of the Buddha of the provisional teachings do not know persons
who have received instruction from the Buddha who assumed a provisional status, and persons taught by that Buddha do not know
persons who have received instruction from the Buddha who revealed his true identity."41 The Great Teacher Dengyo explains,
"This is a direct way, but it is not the great direct way."42 He also says, "Because they have not yet understood the great
direct way to enlightenment."43 The point being made in these passages is clear.
The bodhisattvas of the teachings preached before the Lotus Sutra or of the theoretical teaching have in
a certain sense eradicated delusion and gained understanding of truth. Nevertheless, in the light of the essential teaching,
they have gained only a temporary cutting off of delusion, not the kind that extends beyond a certain dimension. Therefore
it is said that they have in fact not yet cut off delusion.
Thus, although it is said that the bodhisattvas had already gained entrance [to enlightenment] through the
various sutras, the term "gained entrance" is simply applied here in a temporary manner as a means of disparaging the achievement
of the people of the two vehicles. Therefore even the great bodhisattvas of the pre-Lotus Sutra teachings and the theoretical
teaching arrive at the realization of the lotus of the Buddha only when they are exposed to the essential teaching, and achieve
a true cutting off of delusion only when they hear the teachings of the Juryo chapter.
The Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai, commenting on the passage in the Yujutsu chapter in which a period
of time measuring fifty small kalpas is, through the Buddha’s supernatural power, made to seem to the members of the
assembly as though it were no more than half a day, says: "To the awakened ones, what seemed like a short period of time was
understood to be a long one lasting fifty small kalpas; but to those who were still deluded, the long period seemed to be
as short as half a day."44
Miao-lo in turn explains this comment by saying: "The bodhisattvas have already freed themselves from ignorance,
and so they are referred to here as the ‘awakened ones.’ The ordinary beings of the assembly, however, have not
yet advanced beyond the rank of worthy persons,45 and thus they are referred to as the ‘deluded ones.’"46
The meaning of these passages is quite clear. It indicates that the bodhisattvas of the pre-Lotus Sutra
teachings and of the theoretical teaching were in fact still deluded, and only the Bodhisattvas of the Earth were worthy of
being called awakened ones.
Nevertheless, at the present time there are certain persons of the Tendai sect who, when they discuss the
essential teaching and the theoretical teaching, declare that there is no difference between the two, and in interpreting
the passages under discussion, they assert that the persons taught and converted by the Buddha in his transient status are
to be included in the category of "awakened ones." This is a gross error of interpretation! Since the meaning of the sutra
passage and the annotations regarding it is perfectly clear, I do not see how anyone could put forward such an unreasonable
If we examine the passage in the Yujutsu chapter, we see that it states that the Bodhisattvas of the Earth
praised the Thus Come One for a period of fifty small kalpas, but to the members of the assembly on Eagle Peak who had been
taught by the Buddha in his transient status, this seemed like no more than half a day.
T’ien-t’ai in his explanation introduces the terms "awakened ones" and "deluded ones." He explains
that because the assembly members who had been taught by the Buddha in his transient status were deluded ones, they accordingly
believed that the interval of time was no more than half a day, though this was a mistaken interpretation of the facts. The
Bodhisattvas of the Earth, on the other hand, were the awakened ones, and they therefore viewed the interval of time as being
fifty small kalpas in duration, which was the correct interpretation of the facts.
Miao-lo proceeds to comment on this by saying that the bodhisattvas who had freed themselves from ignorance
were the awakened ones, and those that had not yet freed themselves from ignorance were the deluded ones. It is perfectly
clear that this is what the above quotations mean. There are some scholars who say that some among the bodhisattvas taught
by the Buddha in his transient status had attained the first stage of security or advanced beyond it in the course of bodhisattva
practice and hence had already freed themselves from ignorance. They say so because they were taught that the various sutras
that preceded the Lotus Sutra offer a means of attaining Buddhahood, when in fact they do not offer any such means.
Those who have received either the teachings prior to the Lotus Sutra or the theoretical teaching may in
a certain sense attain the stage of perfect enlightenment, but when seen in terms of the true Buddha of the Juryo chapter
of the essential teaching, such persons are still in the company of the deluded or in the rank of worthy persons. The three
bodies of the Buddha as they appear in the provisional teachings have not yet escaped from the realm of impermanence, and
they are therefore in effect phantom Buddhas such as one would see in a dream.
As long as those who have received the teachings prior to the Lotus Sutra or the theoretical teaching have
not yet received instruction in the essential teaching, they are to be described as persons who have not yet extirpated illusion.
But once they have received such a teaching, they qualify for the first stage of security in their progress as bodhisattvas.
Miao-lo comments as follows: "When the Buddha proceeds beyond his transient status and reveals his true
identity, all the listeners enter the first stage of security."47 This may be contrasted to what has been said above about
such persons being in the rank of worthy persons. Persons who have received the teachings prior to the Lotus Sutra or the
theoretical teaching are in the category of the deluded. They are Buddhas and bodhisattvas who have not yet freed themselves
from ignorance. How true! How true!
Therefore we understand that, once the Juryo chapter of the essential teaching had been revealed, all the
persons in the assembly on Eagle Peak became enlightened to the lotus of the entity. Those of the two vehicles, the icchantika
or persons of incorrigible disbelief, and the determinate groups,48 as well as women and evil persons, all gained an awakening
to the lotus of the true Buddha.
The Great Teacher Dengyo, explaining the lotus of the "one great reason" [why the Buddha appears in the
world], writes: "The ‘one great matter,’ the true heart and core of the Lotus Sutra, is the revelation of the
lotus. The word ‘one’ signifies that it is the one reality. The word ‘great’ signifies that it is
broad and all-encompassing in nature. And the word ‘matter’ refers to the essential nature of phenomena. This
one great reason or ‘ultimate matter’ is the truth, the teaching, the wisdom and the practice of the perfect teaching,
or the Dharma body, the wisdom and the emancipation of the perfect teaching. Through this, the persons of the one vehicle,
those of the three vehicles, those of the determinate groups, those of the indeterminate group, those who believe in Buddhist
teachings, those who believe in non-Buddhist teachings, those who have no desire to become Buddhas, and those who are unable
to believe in the correct teachings--all of these beings, every one of them, are brought to the realm of the wisdom penetrating
all phenomena. Thus, this ‘one great reason’ opens the door of Buddha wisdom to all beings, shows it, causes them
to awaken to it and induces them to enter into it, and all of them attain Buddhahood."49
Thus we may say that the so-called evil persons such as women, persons of incorrigible disbelief, those
of the determinate groups and persons of the two vehicles, all at Eagle Peak, were able to gain an awakening to the lotus
of the entity of the Mystic Law.
Question: In our present age, the period of the Latter Day of the Law, who has obtained the lotus of the
Answer: Observing the situation in the world today, we would have to say that, although there are many people
who are destined to fall into the great Avichi hell, there is no one who has obtained the lotus of the Buddha. The reason
is that people put their faith in the expedient means of the provisional teachings that cannot lead to enlightenment, and
slander the lotus of the truth, the entity of the Lotus Sutra.
The Buddha states, "If a person fails to have faith but instead slanders this sutra, immediately he will
destroy all the seeds for becoming a Buddha in this world.... When his life comes to an end he will enter the Avichi hell."50
T’ien-t’ai comments on this as follows: "This [Lotus] sutra opens the seeds of Buddhahood inherent
in the beings of each of the six paths. But if one slanders the sutra, then the seeds will be destroyed."51
I, Nichiren, would like to say this. The Lotus Sutra is linked to the seeds of Buddhahood inherent in the
beings of each of the Ten Worlds. But if one slanders this sutra, then it means that one is destroying the seeds of Buddhahood
in the beings of each of the Ten Worlds. Such a person is certainly bound to fall into the hell of incessant suffering. When
might he manage to get out of hell again?
But those who follow the teachings of Nichiren honestly discard the mistaken doctrines of the provisional
teachings and the incorrect theories of the mistaken teachers, and without hesitation put their faith in the True Law and
the correct doctrines of the correct teacher. Accordingly they are able to gain the lotus of the entity and to manifest the
mystic principle of the entity of the Land of Eternally Tranquil Light. This is because they put their faith in the golden
words of the Buddha indicated in the Juryo chapter of the essential teaching and chant Nam-myoho-renge-kyo.
Question: The great teachers Nan-yueh, T’ien-t’ai and Dengyo employed the Lotus Sutra to spread
widely the perfect teaching of the one vehicle, but they did not recite Nam-myoho-renge-kyo. Why is that? Does this mean that
they did not know about the lotus of the entity, or that they failed to understand it?
Answer It is said that the Great Teacher Nan-yueh was an incarnation of Bodhisattva Kannon, and that the
Great Teacher T’ien-t’ai was an incarnation of Bodhisattva Yakuo.52 If so, then they were present on Eagle Peak
when the Buddha preached the Juryo chapter of the essential teaching, and at that time they became enlightened to the lotus
of the entity. But when they appeared in the world [as Nan-yueh and T’ien-t’ai, respectively], they knew it was
not the right time to spread the Mystic Law. Therefore, for the words "Mystic Law" they substituted the term "concentration
and insight," and instead engaged in the practice of ichinen sanzen and the threefold contemplation in a single mind. But
even these great teachers recited Nam-myoho-renge-kyo as their private practice, and in their hearts they understood these
words to be the truth.
Thus the Great Teacher Nan-yueh in his Hokke sempo53 employs the words Nam-myoho-renge-kyo. The Great Teacher
T’ien-t’ai employs the words Nam-byodo-daie-ichijo-myoho-renge-kyo,54 Keishu-myoho-renge-kyo,55 and Kimyo-myoho-renge-kyo.56
And the document57 concerning the vow taken by the Great Teacher Dengyo on his deathbed carries the words Nam-myoho-renge-kyo.
Question: The evidence you have presented is perfectly clear. But if these men understood the truth, as
the evidence indicates that they did, then why did they not spread a knowledge of it abroad?
Answer: There are two reasons. First of all, the proper time to do so had not yet arrived. Second, these
men were not the persons entrusted with the task of doing so.
It is the five characters of Myoho-renge-kyo that constitute the Great Pure Law that will be spread widely
in the Latter Day of the Law. And it is the great bodhisattvas who sprang up from, the earth in numbers equal to the dust
particles of a thousand worlds who were entrusted with the task of spreading it abroad. Therefore Nan-yueh, T’ien-t’ai
and Dengyo, though in their hearts they understood the truth, left it to the leader and teacher of the Latter Day to spread
it widely, while they themselves refrained from doing so.